Economic Evaluation of Three Available Solutions for Promotion of Wind Power Integration

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The limited operational flexibility of combined heat and power (CHP) units is the main cause of wind power curtailment in the thermal-electrical power system of Northern China. Pumped hydrostorage (PHS), heat storage (HS), and electric boiler (EB) are investigated as three alternative options for the promotion of wind power integration. On the basis of two linear models that determine the capacities of these three facilities required for integrating the curtailed wind power, economic evaluation in terms of investment costs and environmental benefits is presented. Analysis results show that HS requires the least investment and has a good performance of coal saving when accommodating the same amount of curtailed wind power. And EB has the greatest potential for wind power integration with the huge growth of installed capacity of wind power in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, H. K., Yu, Y. J., Chen, L., Jiang, X., & Yu, R. Y. (2017). Economic Evaluation of Three Available Solutions for Promotion of Wind Power Integration. International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1618681

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free