Assessing risk of bias in randomized controlled trials of methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

6Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To test how reliable the tool recommend by Cochrane Collaboration for assessing risk of bias systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials is in the context of methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate a unidimensional model for the 7 indicators, applied to 184 Randomized Clinical Trial (RCTs) within a 2015 Cochrane systematic review titled “Methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.” A unidimensional model resulted in excellent adequacy indices, but only 2 indicators had very high factor loadings and low measurement errors. In terms of content, the 7 indicators showed poor reliability (ω = 0.642); however, the set of indicators was precise in evaluating studies with a high amount of bias risk. The Cochrane model of risk of bias as it is, exhibited good fit indices but the majority of the items were not reliable to adequately capture risk of bias in the context of clinical trials of methylphenidate for ADHD.

References Powered by Scopus

Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

78834Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Annual research review: A meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents

2698Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials

2392Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Revictimization as a high-risk factor for development of posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review of the literature

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk of Bias in Randomized Clinical Trials on Psychological Therapies for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Adults

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodrigues-Tartari, R., Swardfager, W., Salum, G. A., Rohde, L. A., & Cogo-Moreira, H. (2018). Assessing risk of bias in randomized controlled trials of methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1586

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

50%

Researcher 3

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 6

46%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

23%

Sports and Recreations 2

15%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free