The prognostic role of controlling nutritional status scores in patients with solid tumors

40Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the association between preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) scores in various solid tumors and clinical outcomes. Methods Relevant studies published up to August 12, 2017 were identified using electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The pooled hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were calculated to explore the relationship between preoperative CONUT score and prognosis. Results In total, 674 patients with solid tumors from four published studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HR for OS was 1.98 (95% CI, 1.34–2.91, p = 0.001), indicating that patients with high CONUT scores had worse OS. The pooled HR for EFS was 1.98 (95% CI, 1.34–2.93, p = 0.001), revealing that high CONUT scores were significantly associated with short EFS. Conclusions Our data suggest that high preoperative CONUT scores indicate poor prognosis for patients with solid tumors. Further studies are needed to verify the significance of CONUT scores in clinical practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liang, R. F., Li, J. H., Li, M., Yang, Y., & Liu, Y. H. (2017, November 1). The prognostic role of controlling nutritional status scores in patients with solid tumors. Clinica Chimica Acta. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2017.09.021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free