Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer in African American and non-Hispanic White men

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The safety of active surveillance (AS) for African American men compared with non-Hispanic White (White) men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer is unclear. Methods: The authors identified patients with modified National Comprehensive Cancer Network favorable (“low-intermediate”) and unfavorable (“high-intermediate”) intermediate-risk prostate cancer diagnosed between 2001 and 2015 and initially managed with AS in the Veterans Health Administration database. They analyzed definitive treatment, disease progression, metastases, prostate cancer–specific mortality (PCSM), and all-cause mortality by using cumulative incidences and multivariable competing-risks (disease progression, metastasis, and PCSM) or Cox (all-cause mortality) regression. Results: The cohort included 1007 men (African Americans, 330 [32.8%]; Whites, 677 [67.2%]) followed for a median of 7.7 years; 773 (76.8%) had low-intermediate-risk disease, and 234 (23.2%) had high-intermediate-risk disease. The 10-year cumulative incidences of definitive treatment were not significantly different (African Americans, 83.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 78.5%-88.7%; Whites, 80.6%; 95% CI, 76.6%-84.4%; P =.17). Among those with low-intermediate-risk disease, there were no significant differences in the 10-year cumulative incidences of disease progression (African Americans, 46.8%; 95% CI, 40.0%-53.3%; Whites, 46.9%; 95% CI, 42.1%-51.5%; P =.91), metastasis (African Americans, 7.1%; 95% CI, 3.7%-11.8%; Whites, 10.8%; 95% CI, 7.6%-14.6%; P =.17), or PCSM (African Americans, 3.8%; 95% CI, 1.6%-7.5%; Whites, 3.8%; 95% CI, 2.0%-6.3%; P =.69). In a multivariable regression including the entire cohort, African American race was not associated with increased risks of definitive treatment, disease progression, metastasis, PCSM, or all-cause mortality (all P >.30). Conclusions: Outcomes in the Veterans Affairs Health System were similar for African American and White men treated for low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer with AS.

References Powered by Scopus

A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk

11344Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validation of a combined comorbidity index

5464Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer

2138Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Health inequity drives disease biology to create disparities in prostate cancer outcomes

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prognostic Value of the Intermediate-risk Feature in Men with Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Utilization and Cancer Control Outcomes of Active Surveillance Amongst Black and White Men with Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer in a Population-Based Analysis

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Courtney, P. T., Deka, R., Kotha, N. V., Cherry, D. R., Salans, M. A., Nelson, T. J., … Rose, B. S. (2021). Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer in African American and non-Hispanic White men. Cancer, 127(23), 4403–4412. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Researcher 2

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free