Experimental findings: Main factors affecting the adsorptive temperature-driven cycle dynamics

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In Chap. 2, the two main methods to study the sorption dynamics for AHT cycles were widely described: (i) the Large Pressure Jump (LPJ) method, in which adsorption is initiated by a jump of pressure over the sample, is the most adequate for pressure-driven AHT cycles; (ii) the Large Temperature Jump (LTJ) method, in which adsorption is enabled by a temperature swing of a heat exchanger wall that is in contact with the adsorbent under an almost isobaric ad/desorption stage, is the proper choice for temperature-driven AHT cycles (see Chaps. 1 and 2). In this chapter, the main factors affecting the sorption dynamics will be highlighted for temperature-driven AHT cycles by the analysis of results achieved by the two versions (namely V-LTJ and G-LTJ) of the LTJ method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sapienza, A., Frazzica, A., Freni, A., & Aristov, Y. (2018). Experimental findings: Main factors affecting the adsorptive temperature-driven cycle dynamics. In SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology (pp. 31–68). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51287-7_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free