Predicting admission to post-acute inpatient rehabilitation in patients with acute stroke

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To identify predictors of admission to post-acute inpatient rehabilitation settings following acute care for stroke survivors in Taiwan. Design: Prospective observation study. Participants: Stroke survivors (n = 558) admitted to acute care wards for inpatient rehabilitation (62% male; mean age 60.0 ± 12.2 years). Methods: The primary outcome was whether survivors were admitted to post-acute inpatient rehabilitation settings after discharge from acute care wards. Logistic regression model was adopted to examine the predictors of admission to post-acute inpatient rehabilitation. A receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn to compute the ability of the predictors to discriminate the outcome. Results: Multivariate analysis results indicated Activity Measure Post-Acute Care "6-Clicks" Basic Mobility score to be the only significant predictor of admission to post-acute inpatient rehabilitation (odds ratio = 0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.56). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis results indicated that the cut-off point for Basic Mobility was 13 (standardized score: 33.99). This yielded a sensitivity value of 0.98 and a specificity value of 0.96 for determining the admission to post-acute inpatient rehabilitation. Conclusion: Activity Measure Post-Acute Care "6-Clicks" Basic Mobility subscale scores at admission for acute care can predict admission to postacute inpatient rehabilitation for stroke survivors in Taiwan. This tool can aid clinicians in formulating adequate discharge plans at an early stage, and thus improve the quality of care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

CHANG, F. H., LIN, Y. N., LIOU, T. H., LIN, J. C., YANG, C. H., & CHENG, H. L. (2020). Predicting admission to post-acute inpatient rehabilitation in patients with acute stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 52(9). https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2739

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free