Non-acute percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy in patients with ischaemic heart disease

0Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To assess the benefits and harms of non-acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus medical therapy in patients with ischaemic heart disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nielsen, E. E., Feinberg, J., Wetterslev, J., Gluud, C., & Jakobsen, J. C. (2016). Non-acute percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012068

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free