A replication of ‘Entry regulation and entrepreneurship: a natural experiment in German craftsmanship’

14Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Rostam-Afschar (Empir Econ 47:1067–1101, 2014) analyzes the impact of the deregulation of the German Trade and Crafts Code of 2004 on entrepreneurial activity, using German microcensus (MC) data. He finds a uniform positive effect on market entry in partially and fully deregulated trades and no change in exit probabilities. We replicate and extend this study. Most importantly, we generate a novel classification scheme that aims to achieve an improved identification of crafts trades in the microcensus. It is necessary to remove non-craftsmen from the analysis as the policy change exclusively pertains to the crafts sector. In contrast to Rostam-Afschar’s findings, the increase in self-employment and entry is more pronounced in the completely deregulated B1-trades rather than the partially deregulated A-trades. In addition, exit probabilities in fully deregulated trades do not remain constant but rather increase.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Runst, P., Thomä, J., Haverkamp, K., & Müller, K. (2019). A replication of ‘Entry regulation and entrepreneurship: a natural experiment in German craftsmanship.’ Empirical Economics, 56(6), 2225–2252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1457-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free