Circadian variation of sputum inflammatory cells in mild asthma

64Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Asthma, like many conditions, demonstrates a circadian rhythm with a worsening of lung function in the early morning hours compared with in the late afternoon. Objective: Because eosinophilic airway inflammation is a proposed mechanism for worsening asthma, we characterized circadian variation in airway eosinophils and determined its relationship to variability in airway function. Methods: Pulmonary function testing, sputum induction, and phlebotomy were performed at 7 AM and 4 PM in 11 allergic subjects with mild asthma. Sputum was analyzed for cell viability, differential, and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin levels. IL-5 levels in serum were measured by means of ELISA. Results: Subjects had a significant decrease in FEV1 (median [interquartile range] = 80% [70%-86%] vs 85% [82%-94%], P = .009) and a greater β-agonist reversibility (median [interquartile range] = 13% [7%-32%] vs 8% [5%-14%], P = .024) in the early morning compared with in the late afternoon. Sputum analysis showed an increase in early morning total sputum leukocytes (median [interquartile range] = 4.3 × 106 [2.3 × 106 to 6.1 × 106] vs 2.6 × 106 [1.7 × 106 to 3.6 × 106], P = .044) and eosinophils (median [interquartile range] = 7.0 × 104 [2.7 × 104 to 18.7 × 104] vs 3.6 × 104 [1.0 × 104 to 8.2 × 104], P = .024). Furthermore, sputum eosinophils correlated with β-agonist reversibility (Rs = 0.665, P = .019). Finally, levels of IL-5 in serum and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin in sputum were significantly increased at 7 AM. Conclusion: These data suggest that circadian variability in pulmonary function in asthma could be related to changes in airway eosinophil recruitment and activation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Panzer, S. E., Dodge, A. M., Kelly, E. A. B., & Jarjour, N. N. (2003). Circadian variation of sputum inflammatory cells in mild asthma. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 111(2), 308–312. https://doi.org/10.1067/mai.2003.65

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free