An in vitro study of fracture resistance of weakened tooth roots reinforced with two types of adhesive restorative materials

1Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Composite resin (CR) is among the commonly used material for intraradicular reinforcement of weakened tooth roots. Purpose: This study was to compare the fracture resistance of experimentally weakened tooth roots reinforced using auto-polymerized composite resin and light-polymerized composite resin. Materials and Methods: Fifty-six extracted human maxillary incisors were divided into 2 groups (n = 28) and the root canals were over prepared to weaken it. The samples in Group A were restored using light-cured CR Z100 and light-transmitting polymerizing post (Luminex), whereas Group B using auto-cured CR Alpha-dent. Both groups were placed with metal parapost cemented with a resin luting cement (Nexus 2). Specimens were subjected to compressive load (N) using Instron machine until fracture. Data were submitted to independent t test analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Results: There was no significant difference (p = 0.233) in fracture resistance between the teeth reinforced with light-polymerizing and auto-polymerizing CR are 549.3 (± 95.44) and 490.7 (± 110.37) respectively. Conclusion: The use of less technique sensitive auto-polymerizing CR give equivalent benefit effect on reinforcing weakened roots, as the more commonly light-polymerized composite resin.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ahmad, A. M., Bakar, W. Z. W., Husein, A., & Alam, M. K. (2013). An in vitro study of fracture resistance of weakened tooth roots reinforced with two types of adhesive restorative materials. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science, 12(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v12i1.13353

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free