Hintikka has claimed that Gödel did not believe in possible worlds and that the actualism this induces is the motivation behind his Platonism. I argue that Hintikka is wrong about what Gödel believed, and that, moreover, there exists a phenomenological unification of Gödel’s Platonism and possible worlds theory. This text was written for a special issue of Axiomathes on the philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann, which explains the two introductory paragraphs.
CITATION STYLE
van Atten, M. (2015). Gödel, Mathematics, and Possible Worlds. In Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science (Vol. 35, pp. 147–155). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10031-9_7
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.