Insulin resistance in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

14Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Insulin resistance is a critical cause of metabolic dysfunctions. Metabolic dysfunction is common in patients with cancer and is associated with higher cancer recurrence rates and reduced overall survival. Yet, insulin resistance is rarely considered in the clinic and thus it is uncertain how frequently this condition occurs in patients with cancer. Methods: To address this knowledge gap, we performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis guided by the Preferred Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included studies assessing insulin resistance in patients with various cancer diagnoses, using the gold-standard hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp method. Studies eligible for inclusion were as follows: (1) included cancer patients older than 18 years of age; (2) included an age-matched control group consisting of individuals without cancer or other types of neoplasms; (3) measured insulin sensitivity using the hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamp method. We searched the databases MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for articles published from database inception through March 2023 with no language restriction, supplemented by backward and forward citation searching. Bias was assessed using funnel plot. Findings: Fifteen studies satisfied the criteria. The mean insulin-stimulated rate of glucose disposal (Rd) was 7.5 mg/kg/min in control subjects (n = 154), and 4.7 mg/kg/min in patients with a cancer diagnosis (n = 187). Thus, the Rd mean difference was −2.61 mg/kg/min [95% confidence interval, −3.04; −2.19], p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Màrmol, J. M., Carlsson, M., Raun, S. H., Grand, M. K., Sørensen, J., Lang Lehrskov, L., … Sylow, L. (2023). Insulin resistance in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Oncologica, 62(4), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2197124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free