EVA and DEA, which is better in reflecting the capital efficiency?

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Traditionally, people generally believe Economic Value Added (EVA) is one of the best indicators to evaluate capital efficiency of companies. This paper attempts to use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in evaluating the efficiency of capital, and by comparing the samples and conclusions of DEA with those of EVA, it is found that DEA is a better way to reflect the capital efficiency. The two-stage analysis-principal component analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis in this paper provide new ideas for studying capital efficiency of companies. © 2012 Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shi, Y. (2012). EVA and DEA, which is better in reflecting the capital efficiency? In Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing (Vol. 135, pp. 15–23). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27708-5_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free