MicroRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for Tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta- analysis

20Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The early diagnosis of tuberculosis using novel non-sputum-based biomarkers is of high priority in the End TB strategy. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are significant regulators of TB pathogenesis and their differential expression pattern among healthy, latent, and active TB population has revealed their potentiality as biomarkers in recent studies. Thus, we systematically reviewed and performed a meta-analysis on the role of host miRNAs in TB diagnosis. We also reviewed the involvement of miRNAs in the immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). Methods: Pubmed, Ovid and Cochrane databases were searched to retrieve published literature from 2000 to 2020 using predefined keywords. We screened relevant studies based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and the included studies were assessed for their quality using STARD guidelines and QUADAS-2 tool. Funnel plots were constructed to assess the publication bias. The heterogeneity of studies and overall pooled results of sensitivity, specificity and DOR were determined using forest plots. Results: We retrieved a total of 447 studies collectively from all the databases, out of which 21 studies were included for qualitative analysis. In these studies, miR-29, miR-31, miR-125b, miR146a and miR-155 were consistently reported. The overall sensitivity, specificity and DOR of these miRNAs were found to be 87.9% (81.7-92.2), 81.2% (74.5-86.5) and 43.1(20.3-91.3) respectively. Among these, miR-31 had the maximum diagnostic accuracy, with a sensitivity of 96% (89.7-98.5), specificity of 89% (81.2-93.8) and DOR of 345.9 (90.2-1326.3), meeting the minimal target product profile (TPP) for TB diagnostics. Conclusion: miRNAs can thus be exploited as potential biomarkers for rapid detection of tuberculosis as evident from their diagnostic performance. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021226559 PROSPERO (CRD42021226559).

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53020Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

12283Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

STARD 2015: An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies

2284Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

From immunology to artificial intelligence: revolutionizing latent tuberculosis infection diagnosis with machine learning

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Significance of extracellular vesicles in orchestration of immune responses in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of Mycobacterium tuberculosis exosomal miRNAs in host pathogen cross-talk as diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Daniel, E. A., Sathiyamani, B., Thiruvengadam, K., Vivekanandan, S., Vembuli, H., & Hanna, L. E. (2022, September 27). MicroRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for Tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Frontiers in Immunology. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.954396

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 7

47%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

50%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

21%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

14%

Immunology and Microbiology 2

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free