Comparing Objective and Subjective Measures of Usability in a Human-Robot Dialogue System

19Citations
Citations of this article
134Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We present a human-robot dialogue system that enables a robot to work together with a human user to build wooden construction toys. We then describe a study in which naïve subjects interacted with this system under a range of conditions and then completed a user-satisfaction questionnaire. The results of this study provide a wide range of subjective and objective measures of the quality of the interactions. To assess which aspects of the interaction had the greatest impact on the users’ opinions of the system, we used a method based on the PARADISE evaluation framework (Walker et al., 1997) to derive a performance function from our data. The major contributors to user satisfaction were the number of repetition requests (which had a negative effect on satisfaction), the dialogue length, and the users’ recall of the system instructions (both of which contributed positively).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foster, M. E., Giuliani, M., & Knoll, A. (2009). Comparing Objective and Subjective Measures of Usability in a Human-Robot Dialogue System. In ACL-IJCNLP 2009 - Joint Conf. of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 4th Int. Joint Conf. on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, Proceedings of the Conf. (pp. 879–887). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1690219.1690270

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free