Increasing agreement over time in interlaboratory anatomic pathology consultation material

5Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To undertake a retrospective study of the rate of diagnostic discrepancy for patient/clinician-initiated second opinions in anatomic pathology at our institution and determine if this rate has changed and whether the change could be explained. Methods: We reviewed all patient/clinician- initiated consults (incoming and outgoing) handled by our institution over a 6 3/4-year (27 quarters) period in which the original and consult reports were available. Results: The rate of disagreement from the first 14 to the second 13 quarters declined from 20.4% to 15.4% (P = .004) for incoming consults and from 9.7% to 4.1% (P < .001) for outgoing consults. Significant decreases in the rate of immunohistochemistry, percentage of reports with 2 pathologists' names, and percentage of cytology and endocrine cases were noted for incoming consults. Only a decrease in the percentage of cases with 2 pathologists' names was identified in outgoing consultations. Conclusions: Disagreements in interlaboratory anatomic pathology consults decreased over time, and some but not all changes had features associated with increased agreement. © American Society for Clinical Pathology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Renshaw, A. A., & Gould, E. W. (2013). Increasing agreement over time in interlaboratory anatomic pathology consultation material. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 140(2), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCP5R2FDVBZMQTY

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free