Objectives: To undertake a retrospective study of the rate of diagnostic discrepancy for patient/clinician-initiated second opinions in anatomic pathology at our institution and determine if this rate has changed and whether the change could be explained. Methods: We reviewed all patient/clinician- initiated consults (incoming and outgoing) handled by our institution over a 6 3/4-year (27 quarters) period in which the original and consult reports were available. Results: The rate of disagreement from the first 14 to the second 13 quarters declined from 20.4% to 15.4% (P = .004) for incoming consults and from 9.7% to 4.1% (P < .001) for outgoing consults. Significant decreases in the rate of immunohistochemistry, percentage of reports with 2 pathologists' names, and percentage of cytology and endocrine cases were noted for incoming consults. Only a decrease in the percentage of cases with 2 pathologists' names was identified in outgoing consultations. Conclusions: Disagreements in interlaboratory anatomic pathology consults decreased over time, and some but not all changes had features associated with increased agreement. © American Society for Clinical Pathology.
CITATION STYLE
Renshaw, A. A., & Gould, E. W. (2013). Increasing agreement over time in interlaboratory anatomic pathology consultation material. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 140(2), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCP5R2FDVBZMQTY
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.