Determination of the VE/VCO2 slope from a constant work-rate exercise test cardiac patients

11Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Incremental exercise testing to a symptom-limited maximum has been used to measure the ratio of the increase in ventilation (VE) to the increase in CO 2 output (VCO2) during exercise (VE/VCO2 slope), a valuable index reflecting the severity of the ventilation-perfusion mismatch in heart failure. Here we studied whether this same value for the slope of VE/VCO2 could be determined from a short constant work-rate exercise test of moderate intensity. Twenty-three patients with a previous myocardial infarction underwent moderate-intensity (69 ± 15 W) constant work-rate exercise for 6 min and an incremental work-rate exercise test to the max. The VE/VCO2 slope was calculated from the incremental exercise test from the start of increasing the work-rate to the ventilatory compensation point. The VE/VCO2 slope was similarly calculated from the start of constant work-rate exercise until the 4th minute, when VE and VCO2 changed minimally. The VE/VCO2 slope determined from incremental exercise was 33.8 ± 5.9, ranging from 20.9 to 42.8. The slope obtained from constant work-rate exercise was 32.9 ± 5.7. The VE/VCO2 slopes obtained from the two exercise tests did not differ significantly. The slope obtained from constant work-rate exercise was significantly positively correlated with the slope obtained from the incremental exercise (r = 0.84, p < 0.0001). The VE/VCO2 slope can be determined from constant work-rate exercise at a moderate intensity. This indicates that the relationship between ventilation and CO 2 output is consistent and independent of the mode of exercise testing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoshimoto-Iwamoto, M., Koike, A., Nagayama, O., Tajima, A., Uejima, T., Adachi, H., … Wasserman, K. (2008). Determination of the VE/VCO2 slope from a constant work-rate exercise test cardiac patients. Journal of Physiological Sciences, 58(4), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.2170/physiolsci.RP006108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free