Questioning Human Dignity: The Dimensions of Dignity Model as a Bridge Between Cosmopolitanism and the Particular

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The claim that human dignity is universal is challenged by the particular experience of the horrible things people do to others. If dignity is just a ‘vacuous concept’ then the notion of universal human rights and the claim of cosmopolitanism that all human beings form a single moral community are also called into question. A close reading of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and an analysis the historical development of the text reveals a complex conception of human dignity as expressed by the Component Dimensions of Human Dignity model. The model conceives of human dignity in terms of four Component Dimensions—existential, behavioral, cognitive-affective and social—each consisting of a Complementary Duality comprising two facets held in tension along an axis of the Already and the Not Yet. Consequently, human dignity can be understood both as Already a universal truth, and as Not Yet realized in every particular life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kirchhoffer, D. G. (2016). Questioning Human Dignity: The Dimensions of Dignity Model as a Bridge Between Cosmopolitanism and the Particular. In Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures (Vol. 15, pp. 167–179). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25724-2_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free