The claim that human dignity is universal is challenged by the particular experience of the horrible things people do to others. If dignity is just a ‘vacuous concept’ then the notion of universal human rights and the claim of cosmopolitanism that all human beings form a single moral community are also called into question. A close reading of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and an analysis the historical development of the text reveals a complex conception of human dignity as expressed by the Component Dimensions of Human Dignity model. The model conceives of human dignity in terms of four Component Dimensions—existential, behavioral, cognitive-affective and social—each consisting of a Complementary Duality comprising two facets held in tension along an axis of the Already and the Not Yet. Consequently, human dignity can be understood both as Already a universal truth, and as Not Yet realized in every particular life.
CITATION STYLE
Kirchhoffer, D. G. (2016). Questioning Human Dignity: The Dimensions of Dignity Model as a Bridge Between Cosmopolitanism and the Particular. In Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures (Vol. 15, pp. 167–179). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25724-2_11
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.