U.S. Military Service members' perceptions of the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program

9Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This research identifies the perceptions of U.S. military service members regarding the Department of Defense Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP). The service members' perceptions were addressed in the dimensions of ethics, effectiveness, and safety, as well as the overall perceptions of the AVIP. The study, conducted in October 2004, randomly selected active duty service members from the uniformed services assigned to a Caribbean military base who participated in the AVIP during the period of 1998 to 2000. Their perceptions were measured with a survey instrument with 14 closed-ended, Likert-scale questions. The research demonstrated that a substantial number of service members disagreed with issues regarding the ethics, safety, and efficacy of the AVIP. We recommend enhanced training and education to increase understanding of the benefits of the AVIP.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Military medical ethics: A review of the literature and a call to arms

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Safety of inadvertent anthrax vaccination during pregnancy: An analysis of birth defects in the U.S. military population, 2003–2010

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cross-sectional survey of anthrax vaccine coverage and KAP among deployed US military

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pica-Branco, D., & Hudak, R. P. (2008). U.S. Military Service members’ perceptions of the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program. Military Medicine, 173(5), 429–433. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED.173.5.429

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

82%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Researcher 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 4

33%

Psychology 4

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

25%

Philosophy 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free