Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab in first-or second-line treatment

56Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Panitumumab in combination with chemotherapy was evaluated in two pivotal clinical trials in first-and second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), respectively. This analysis compared the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with or without panitumumab in the two trials. Methods: Patients with mCRC were randomised to FOLFOX (first-line trial) or FOLFIRI (second-line trial)±panitumumab. The EuroQoL 5-Dimensions Health State Index (EQ-5D HSI) and Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D VAS) were assessed at baseline and monthly follow-up until disease progression. Patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC with baseline and post-baseline HRQoL scores were included. Difference in change from baseline between treatment groups was evaluated using linear mixed and pattern-mixture models. Results: In the first-line trial, 576 patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC (284 panitumumabFOLFOX4 and 292 FOLFOX4 alone) were included in the HRQoL analyses. In the second-line trial, 530 patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC were included in these analyses (263 panitumumabFOLFIRI and 267 FOLFIRI alone). There was no significant difference in the change in EQ-5D HSI and VAS scores between treatment groups in either trial. Conclusion: The addition of panitumumab to FOLFOX4 or FOLFIRI in first-or second-line treatment of wild-type KRAS mCRC significantly improved progression-free survival without compromising HRQoL. © 2011 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bennett, L., Zhao, Z., Barber, B., Zhou, X., Peeters, M., Zhang, J., … Douillard, J. Y. (2011). Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with panitumumab in first-or second-line treatment. British Journal of Cancer, 105(10), 1495–1502. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.409

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free