On Authentication, Digital Signatures and Signature Laws

  • Kaijser P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although, with the coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty, two provisions of EU primary law now refer to minorities,' there are no explicit EU competences and policies to promote the rights of minority groups in education. Nevertheless, EU law has a strong potential to impact the educational rights of linguistic minorities in Member States. To evaluate the right to access education, with an emphasis on the needs of minorities to preserve their identity, this paper first discusses the EU's relevant competences in education (Part II) and then in languages (Part III). Based on the analysis of relevant EU provisions, the paper concludes that EU law is unlikely to offer meaningful protection to linguistic minorities without explicitly endorsing their educational rights. However, to do so, the EU needs a stronger competence in education and minority rights.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaijser, P. (1999). On Authentication, Digital Signatures and Signature Laws. In Secure Information Networks (pp. 117–130). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35568-9_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free