Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial

10Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced therapeutic technique for en bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Although gastric ESD is minimally invasive and provides favorable outcomes, it is technically difficult and requires a long procedure time for dissection. The traction-assisted approach overcomes some of the difficulties of gastric ESD, but its ability to reduce the procedure time remains unclear. The traction-assisted approach using dental floss and a clip did not reduce procedure time in the total population, but it reduced procedure time for lesions limited to the greater curvature of the upper or middle of the stomach. Although the traction direction of the clip-with-line method may be limited to the oral side via the cardia, EndoTrac ESD may provide flexible traction at any time during the procedure. This prospective randomized control study has been designed to compare the efficacy and safety of EndoTrac and conventional gastric ESD. Methods/design: This multicenter, randomized control trial will enroll 150 patients at 2 hospitals in Japan undergoing EndoTrac or conventional ESD for gastric epithelial neoplasia. Patients with a single gastric epithelial neoplasm who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to EndoTrac or conventional ESD. Patients will be randomized by a computer-generated random sequence with stratification by operator experience, tumor size, tumor location, and institution. The primary endpoint will be ESD procedure time, defined as the time from the start of the submucosal injection to the completion of resection. Other outcomes will include the rates of adverse events and pathological curability Discussion: The ability of EndoTrac ESD to reduce the long procedure time and/or adverse events observed with conventional ESD can not only reduce physical stress on the patient, but can also reduce length of hospital stay and medical costs. Reduced technical difficulty will contribute to the widespread adoption of this ESD technique worldwide. Trial registration: University Hospital Medial Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR), ID: 000044450; Registered on June 6, 2021. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000050485. Protocol version number: 1.1, March 1, 2022. Patient enrolment began on June 6, 2021 and is expected to be completed by July 19, 2025.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kinoshita, J., Iguchi, M., Maekita, T., Wan, K., Shimokawa, T., Fukatsu, K., … Kitano, M. (2022). Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (United States), 101(13), E29172. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029172

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free