How might a statistical cloud scheme be coupled to a mass-flux convection scheme?

15Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The coupling of statistical cloud schemes with mass-flux convection schemes is adressed. Source terms representing the impact of convection are derived within the framework of prognostic equations for the width and asymmetry of the probability distribution function of total water mixing ratio. The accuracy of these source terms is quantified by examining output from a cloud-resolving model simulation of deep convection. Practical suggestions for the inclusion of these source terms in large-scale models are offered. Copyright 2005 by the American Geophysical Union.

References Powered by Scopus

Cloud resolving modeling of the ARM summer 1997 IOP: Model formulation, results, uncertainties, and sensitivities

753Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A scheme for predicting layer clouds and their water content in a general circulation model

722Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A PDF-based model for boundary layer clouds. Part I: Method and model description

423Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Stochastic nature of physical parameterizations in ensemble prediction: A stochastic convection approach

84Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Representation of Arctic mixed-phase clouds and the Wegener-Bergeron- Findeisen process in climate models: Perspectives from a cloud-resolving study

66Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A PDF-based hybrid prognostic cloud scheme for general circulation models

57Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klein, S. A., Pincus, R., Hannay, C., & Xu, K. M. (2005). How might a statistical cloud scheme be coupled to a mass-flux convection scheme? Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres, 110(15), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005017

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

53%

Researcher 6

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 14

88%

Physics and Astronomy 1

6%

Environmental Science 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free