The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science

129Citations
Citations of this article
194Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Scientific articles are retracted at increasing rates, with the highest rates among top journals. Here we show that a single retraction triggers citation losses through an author's prior body of work. Compared to closely-matched control papers, citations fall by an average of 6.9% per year for each prior publication. These chain reactions are sustained on authors' papers (a) published up to a decade earlier and (b) connected within the authors' own citation network by up to 4 degrees of separation from the retracted publication. Importantly, however, citation losses among prior work disappear when authors self-report the error. Our analyses and results span the range of scientific disciplines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lu, S. F., Jin, G. Z., Uzzi, B., & Jones, B. (2013). The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science. Scientific Reports, 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03146

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free