Activated sludge sequencial batch as an optional post-treatment of UASB reactor effluent

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Modern anaerobic systems for domestic sewage treatment, although very effective in removing organic matter and suspended solids, do not produce a quality effluent that complies with the legal standards for discharge into water bodies. Therefore, such systems have to be associated with post treatment units. This paper deals with an experimental investigation into the feasibility of applying the activated sludge system as an alternative post-treatment, specifically for the case where reuse of the final wastewater for fertigation is expected. In the experimental investigation, a pilot-scale sequencing batch reactor (SBR), in laboratory scale, was used as a post-treatment unit. The experimental results showed that the behavior of the RBS system can be described with the general IWA model for activated sludge, resulting in the definition of the fundamental aspects: quality of the final effluent, oxygen consumption, and sludge production. In the optimization of the RBS reactor, a model was developed to establish the minimum retention time for the post-treatment in terms of two basic parameters: the biodegradable organic material utilization constant by heterotrophic bacteria sludge of the posttreatment system and the sedimentability of this sludge. The organic material utilization constant was determined by respirometry testing. The sludge generated in the post-treatment system surprisingly been shown to have a much higher sedimentability than that normally found in activated sludge systems dealing with raw sewage, which is a sound argument for applying the RBS system in the practice of post-treatment reactor effluent UASB.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Paiva, L. A. L., Van Haandel, A. C., & Mota, L. S. (2020). Activated sludge sequencial batch as an optional post-treatment of UASB reactor effluent. Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental, 25(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-41522020159463

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free