Aggressive Therapeutic Strategies Improve the Survival of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Performance Status 1 or 2: A Propensity Score Analysis

16Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Targeted therapy or chemotherapy is suggested as standard treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with performance status (PS) 1–2 according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system. The underlying rationales have not been fully studied. Methods: This study enrolled 2,620 HCC patients. One-to-one matched pairs between HCC patients receiving aggressive anti-HCC treatments (resection, transplantation, ablation, and transarterial chemoembolization) and those receiving targeted therapy or chemotherapy or best supportive care were generated by using the propensity score with a matching model. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test. Mortality risk was calculated with the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Of 793 patients with PS 1–2, 64 % received aggressive anti-HCC treatments against the suggestion of the BCLC system. The patients receiving aggressive anti-HCC treatments had significantly milder cirrhosis, a smaller tumor burden, and better long-term survival than the patients undergoing targeted therapy or chemotherapy or best supportive care (all p < 0.05). With the use of propensity scores, 166 pairs of matched HCC patients with PS 1–2 were selected from different treatment groups. After matching, patients were comparable in age, gender, severity of cirrhosis, tumor burden, and prevalence of diabetes mellitus (all p > 0.05) at baseline. In the propensity score model, patients with PS 1–2 undergoing aggressive anti-HCC treatments had significantly better long-term survival (p < 0.0001). The adjusted hazard ratio of the choice for targeted therapy or chemotherapy or best supportive care to the choice for aggressive anti-HCC treatments was 2.028 (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: According to the findings, HCC patients with PS 1–2 should consider aggressive anticancer treatments if no contraindication is noted. Adjustment of the BCLC treatment allocation is needed to enhance its prognostic accuracy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hsu, C. Y., Liu, P. H., Lee, Y. H., Hsia, C. Y., Huang, Y. H., Chiou, Y. Y., … Huo, T. I. (2015). Aggressive Therapeutic Strategies Improve the Survival of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Performance Status 1 or 2: A Propensity Score Analysis. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 22(4), 1324–1331. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4151-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free