Towards Multi‐Dimensional Ethnography

  • HAINES J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, I argue for the value of multi‐dimensional ethnography. I explore the potential for ethnography to venture beyond sites, into different dimensions. As an example of work moving in this direction, I present a new approach, dubbed TRACES, which emphasizes the assemblages that constitute our lives, interweaving digital, embodied, and internal experiences. Various data streams and sources provide different vantage points for analysis and synthesis. I illustrate how we have used these to gain greater insight into the human lives we study, with different data sources providing different perspectives on a world, then delve into our use of tools, data sources, and methods from other traditions and other fields, which, combined, give us not only a more holistic picture, but a truer one, which refutes the false dichotomy of the digital and the real. I argue that we must continue to adapt and extend ethnography today into such spaces, and that reformulating the sites of ethnography as dimensions enables us to envision future subjects and objects of study in different ways.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

HAINES, J. K. (2017). Towards Multi‐Dimensional Ethnography. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 2017(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/1559-8918.2017.01143

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free