Indicators of success should be sensitive to compositional failures: Reply to Suganuma and Durigan

26Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Species composition is a fundamental attribute of restored ecosystems, but it was excluded from a recent set of indicators of restoration success recommended for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Suganuma and Durigan (2015) write off species composition as "unpredictable," but their analysis did not account for key compositional predictors, like site history and restoration technique. The result is a framework for evaluating restoration success that is insensitive to common restoration failures-including poor ecosystem functioning and lack of resilience.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leighton Reid, J. (2015). Indicators of success should be sensitive to compositional failures: Reply to Suganuma and Durigan. Restoration Ecology, 23(5), 519–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12254

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free