Influence of the implant diameter with different sizes of hexagon: Analysis by 3-dimensional finite element method

19Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution in implants of regular platforms and of wide diameter with different sizes of hexagon by the 3-dimensional finite element method. We used simulated 3-dimensional models with the aid of Solidworks 2006 and Rhinoceros 4.0 software for the design of the implant and abutment and the InVesalius software for the design of the bone. Each model represented a block of bone from the mandibular molar region with an implant 10 mm in length and different diameters. Model A was an implant 3.75 mm/regular hexagon, model B was an implant 5.00 mm/regular hexagon, and model C was an implant 5.00 mm/ expanded hexagon. A load of 200 N was applied in the axial, lateral, and oblique directions. At implant, applying the load (axial, lateral, and oblique), the 3 models presented stress concentration at the threads in the cervical and middle regions, and the stress was higher for model A. At the abutment, models A and B showed a similar stress distribution, concentrated at the cervical and middle third; model C showed the highest stresses. On the cortical bone, the stress was concentrated at the cervical region for the 3 models and was higher for model A. In the trabecular bone, the stresses were less intense and concentrated around the implant body, and were more intense for model A. Among the models of wide diameter (models B and C), model B (implant 5.00 mm/regular hexagon) was more favorable with regard to distribution of stresses. Model A (implant 3.75 mm/regular hexagon) showed the largest areas and the most intense stress, and model B (implant 5.00 mm/regular hexagon) showed a more favorable stress distribution. The highest stresses were observed in the application of lateral load.

References Powered by Scopus

A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw

3896Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal

1724Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants

659Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Abutment height influences the effect of platform switching on peri-implant marginal bone loss

76Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of crown-to-implant ratio on peri-implant stress: A finite element analysis

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Finite Element Stress Analysis of Applied Forces to Implants and Supporting Tissues Using the “All-on-Four” Concept with Different Occlusal Schemes

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pellizzer, E. P., Verri, F. R., De Moraes, S. L. D., Falcón-Antenucci, R. M., De Carvalho, P. S. P., & Noritomi, P. Y. (2013). Influence of the implant diameter with different sizes of hexagon: Analysis by 3-dimensional finite element method. Journal of Oral Implantology, 39(4), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00103

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

88%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Researcher 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 16

70%

Engineering 3

13%

Materials Science 2

9%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0