A darkening spring: How preexisting distrust shaped COVID-19 skepticism

26Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite widespread communication of the health risks associated with the COVID-19 virus, many Americans underestimated its risks and were antagonistic regarding preventative measures. Political partisanship has been linked to diverging attitudes towards the virus, but the cognitive processes underlying this divergence remain unclear. Bayesian models fit to data gathered through two preregistered online surveys, administered before (March 13, 2020, N = 850) and during the first wave (April-May, 2020, N = 1610) of cases in the United States, reveal two preexisting forms of distrust-distrust in Democratic politicians and in medical scientists-that drove initial skepticism about the virus. During the first wave of cases, additional factors came into play, suggesting that skeptical attitudes became more deeply embedded within a complex network of auxiliary beliefs. These findings highlight how mechanisms that enhance cognitive coherence can drive anti-science attitudes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Priniski, J. H., & Holyoak, K. J. (2022). A darkening spring: How preexisting distrust shaped COVID-19 skepticism. PLoS ONE, 17(1 January). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263191

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free