Are double-lane roundabouts safe enough? A chaid analysis of unsafe driving behaviors

10Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study investigated the nature and causes of unsafe driving behavior at roundabouts through an on-road study. Four urban double-lane roundabouts with different layouts were selected for an on-road study. Sixty-six drivers (41 males and 25 females) aged 18–65 years took part in the study. Unsafe behaviors observed during the in situ survey were divided into three different categories: entry unsafe behaviors, circulation unsafe behaviors, and exit unsafe behaviors. Three chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID) analyses were developed in order to analyze the influence of roundabout characteristics and maneuvers on unsafe behaviors at double-lane roundabouts. The results confirmed the awareness that double-lane roundabouts are unsafe and inadvisable. More than half of unsafe driving behaviors were found to be entry unsafe behaviors. Moreover, the entry radius was found to be the geometric variable most influencing unsafe driving behaviors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pulvirenti, G., Distefano, N., Leonardi, S., & Tollazzi, T. (2021). Are double-lane roundabouts safe enough? A chaid analysis of unsafe driving behaviors. Safety, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/safety7010020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free