Extent of visceral pleural invasion affects prognosis of resected non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis

25Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Visceral pleural invasion (VPI) has been known to be an adverse prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the prognostic significance of extent of VPI (PL0, PL1 and PL2) remains controversial. We conduct a meta-analysis to summarize available evidence on this topic. PubMed, EMBASE, OVID and The Cochrane Library were searched for published studies from inception to May 9, 2016. A total of 16 studies were included in meta-analysis. Our results showed that patients with PL1 or PL2 had poorer overall survival compared with PL0 (HR = 1.555, 95% CI 1.399, 1.730; HR = 2.447, 95% CI 1.913, 3.130) and patients with PL2 had even poorer overall survival than PL1 (HR = 1.287, 95% CI 1.114, 1.487). Patients with PL1 or PL2 had lower 5-year survival rate than PL0 patients (OR = 0.515, 95% CI 0.415, 0.640; OR = 0.441, 95% CI 0.336, 0.579) and patients with PL2 had even lower 5-year survival rate than PL1 (OR = 0.706, 95% CI 0.545, 0.915). In conclusion, extent of VPI impacts the prognosis of resected NSCLC and VPI should be categorized as PL1 and PL2 in the terms of clinical practice and trials.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, T., Zhou, C., & Zhou, Q. (2017). Extent of visceral pleural invasion affects prognosis of resected non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01845-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free