Forgiving, fast and slow: Validity of the implicit association test for predicting differential response latencies in a transgression-recall paradigm

14Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study examined the role of automaticity in forgiving a real-life offense. As an alternative to self-report, an Implicit Association Test (IAT) of forgiveness was developed. Implicit (IAT-measured) and explicit (self-reported) forgiveness predicted shorter response times of state forgiveness ratings. The forgiveness IAT was highly reliable, moderately stable over time, and demonstrated incremental validity. Results suggest that the newly introduced forgiveness IAT could advance personality research beyond what is known from self-report measures, further corroborating the notion of implicit forgiveness. Implications for personality assessment are discussed. © 2014 Fatfouta, Schröder-Abé and Merkl.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test

8370Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research

4557Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: I. An Improved Scoring Algorithm

4237Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Narcissism and lack of interpersonal forgiveness: The mediating role of state anger, state rumination, and state empathy

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring forgiveness: A systematic review

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

I'm merciful, am I not? Facets of narcissism and forgiveness revisited

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fatfouta, R., Schröder-Abé, M., & Merkl, A. (2014). Forgiving, fast and slow: Validity of the implicit association test for predicting differential response latencies in a transgression-recall paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(JUL). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00728

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

58%

Researcher 5

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 22

85%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

8%

Philosophy 1

4%

Neuroscience 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free