The Seven Deadly Sins of Performance Auditing: Implications for Monitoring Public Audit Institutions

Abstract

Performance auditing is a longstanding feature of democratic government in many countries. It aims to lift the efficiency and effectiveness of public sector organisations, but numerous authors have voiced scepticism about its ability to do so. From three decades of performance auditing literature, this paper distils seven critiques of performance auditing: 'anti-innovation', 'nit-picking', 'expectations gap', 'lapdog', 'headline hunting', 'unnecessary systems' and 'hollow ritual'. The paper concludes that the critiques are not valid in all cases, but serve to categorise risks to be managed in the design of performance audit programs and associated institutional arrangements. In light of the critiques, the paper proposes desirable elements of frameworks for monitoring and reporting the performance of institutions with performance audit mandates. © 2011 CPA Australia.