Sexism, feminism and medicalism: a decade review of literature on gender and illness

50Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstract Do we really have a dependent variable in our study of the sex differences in illness and sex differences in the explanations for illness? The purpose of this paper, which reviews the literature in this area over the past decade, is to argue that because of both conceptual and methodological difficulties in the definition of health/illness, there are serious problems in the available analyses to date. Confusions between medical and lay definitions, mental and physical illness, illness per se and illness behaviour are among the issues raised with respect to the first issue: conceptual and definitional incommensurability. Proxy respondents, distinctions between males and females in illness experience, and improper rate calculation are among the issues discussed in the section concerning methodology. Copyright © 1983, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clarke, J. N. (1983). Sexism, feminism and medicalism: a decade review of literature on gender and illness. Sociology of Health & Illness, 5(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11340067

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free