Competing Imaginaries of Solar Geoengineering

  • Baskin J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This Chapter analyses three competing imaginaries of solar geoengineering (SGE) and their associated logics, assumptions and narratives. It identifies the most prominent of these as the ‘Imperial’ imaginary which brings together three narrative strands (‘Market’, ‘Geo-management’ and ‘Salvation’). It also identifies two oppositional imaginaries, one which is labelled the ‘Un-Natural’ imaginary, and another which is labelled the ‘Chemtrail’ imaginary and which operates in a different register. The Chapter examines the implicit and explicit values, worldviews and ontological orderings in these competing imaginaries. Each of these engages with SGE beyond a purely technoscientific framing, but none has yet managed to emerge as hegemonic. Without a hegemonic narrative it becomes difficult for SGE to be officially embraced and normalised as both applied technology and legitimate addition to climate policy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baskin, J. (2019). Competing Imaginaries of Solar Geoengineering. In Geoengineering, the Anthropocene and the End of Nature (pp. 123–161). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17359-3_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free