Changes in the endurance shuttle walk test in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure after pulmonary rehabilitation: The minimal important difference obtained with anchor- and distribution-based method

23Citations
Citations of this article
142Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Although the endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT) has proven to be responsive to change in exercise capacity after pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for COPD, the minimally important difference (MID) has not yet been established. We aimed to establish the MID of the ESWT in patients with severe COPD and chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure following PR.Methods: Data were derived from a randomized controlled trial, investigating the value of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation added to PR. Fifty-five patients with stable COPD, GOLD stage IV, with chronic respiratory failure were included (mean (SD) FEV 1 31.1 (12.0) % pred, age 62 (9) y). MID estimates of the ESWT in seconds, percentage and meters change were calculated with anchor based and distribution based methods. Six minute walking distance (6MWD), peak work rate on bicycle ergometry (Wpeak) and Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) were used as anchors and Cohen's effect size was used as distribution based method.Results: The estimated MID of the ESWT with the different anchors ranged from 186-199 s, 76-82% and 154-164 m. Using the distribution based method the MID was 144 s, 61% and 137 m.Conclusions: Estimates of the MID for the ESWT after PR showed only small differences using different anchors in patients with COPD and chronic respiratory failure. Therefore we recommend using a range of 186-199 s, 76-82% or 154-164 m as MID of the ESWT in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure. Further research in larger populations should elucidate whether this cut-off value is also valid in other COPD populations and with other interventions.

References Powered by Scopus

Standardisation of spirometry

12966Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference

4035Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes

2261Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The minimal important difference for the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with severe COPD

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of prehabilitation and rehabilitation including a home-based component on physical fitness, adherence, treatment tolerance, and recovery in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Early pulmonary rehabilitation after acute exacerbation of COPD: A randomised controlled trial

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Altenburg, W. A., Duiverman, M. L., ten Hacken, N. H. T., Kerstjens, H. A. M., de Greef, M. H. G., Wijkstra, P. J., & Wempe, J. B. (2015). Changes in the endurance shuttle walk test in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure after pulmonary rehabilitation: The minimal important difference obtained with anchor- and distribution-based method. Respiratory Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0182-x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 46

68%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

15%

Researcher 9

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 36

49%

Nursing and Health Professions 29

40%

Sports and Recreations 5

7%

Neuroscience 3

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free