A generic tool for building fuzzy cognitive map systems

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A generic system for simulating complex dynamical systems along the paradigm of fuzzy cognitive maps (FCM) has been created and tested. The proposed system enables a user to design appropriate FCM structures, by specifying the desired concepts and the various parameters such as sensitivities, as well as a variety of shaping functions. The user is able to see the results, change the parameters, modify the functions, and rerun the system using an alteration of the final results and make new conclusions. The system is introduced and demonstrated using a simple real case. The results of a usability test of the system suggest that the system is capable of simulating complicated FCM structures in an effective manner, helping the user to reduce the degree of risks during decision making. © 2010 IFIP.

References Powered by Scopus

Fuzzy cognitive maps

2947Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modeling Complex Systems Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps

409Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The potential of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil

304Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A semi-quantitative modelling application for assessing energy efficiency strategies

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Use of soft computing techniques in medical decision making: A survey

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

FCM-GUI: A graphical user interface for big bang-big crunch learning of FCM

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Papaioannou, M., Neocleous, C., Sofokleous, A., Mateou, N., Andreou, A., & Schizas, C. N. (2010). A generic tool for building fuzzy cognitive map systems. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 339 AICT, pp. 45–52). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16239-8_9

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

83%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

40%

Computer Science 3

30%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

20%

Chemical Engineering 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free