Whatever happened to group dynamics in the scientific study of groups?

3Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore whether a group dynamics perspective still exists in the scientific study of groups and what factors may account for the current situation. Design/methodology/approach: Alongside reflections based on my professional experience, I have analyzed the main academic journals that publish group research. Findings: A group dynamics perspective is almost totally absent in the scientific study of groups. Contributing factors to this state of affairs are disciplinary developments in psychology (e.g. individualization, experimentalization and specialization), the demise of the status of psychoanalysis, changes in the meaning and manifestation of the “group,” and effects of New Public Management. Originality/value: The study offers a critical perspective on current group research practices and considers these in a larger (social and historical) context. It advocates a group dynamics perspective for the study of groups, based on systems-psychodynamic insights.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schruijer, S. G. L. (2021). Whatever happened to group dynamics in the scientific study of groups? Team Performance Management, 27(3–4), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-10-2020-0091

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free