An evolutionary and cognitive neuroscience perspective on moral modularity

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the 19th century, the case of Phineas Gage suggested that our moral sense could be located in a particular area of the brain. Damage to a part of the prefrontal cortex seemed to have selectively bereft the railroad worker of his moral faculties, resulting in lawless and anti-social behaviour. Additional studies revealed that behaviour of Phineas Gage and patients with similar brain damage can be further characterized by the disturbance of social behaviour, a diminished response of social emotions such as compassion and failures in non-moral decision-making or planning (Anderson, Bechara, Damasio, Tranel, & Damasio, 1999). As the damage is not selective, the moral misbehaviour syndrome is apparently not confined to the moral sphere alone. This leads to the conclusion that there is no discrete moral centre or single morality module in the brain (Greene, 2005).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Schrijver, J. (2009). An evolutionary and cognitive neuroscience perspective on moral modularity. In The Moral Brain: Essays on the Evolutionary and Neuroscientific Aspects of Morality (pp. 255–270). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6287-2_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free