Water circulation forecasting in Spanish harbours

  • Grifoll M
  • Jordà G
  • Sotillo M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper describes the first harbour circulation forecasting system implemented in Spain. The configuration design was based on previous analyses of the morphologic and hydrodynamic behaviour of three harbours: Barcelona, Tarragona and Bilbao. A nested system of oceanic models was implemented, with a scope ranging from the regional scale (with a mean horizontal resolution of 5 km) to the harbour scale (with a mean horizontal resolution of 40 m). A set of sensitivity tests was carried out in order to determine the optimal configurations. The results of the operational system were compared with available observations, revealing that the intermediate models are able to reproduce the averaged hydrodynamic behaviour but not the spatio-temporal variability. With the harbour models the quality of the forecasts improves, reaching a correlation and RMSE of ~0.6 and 6 cm s -1 , respectively, for Bilbao harbour. In addition, numerical experiments were carried out to evaluate the sensitivity of the forecasts to error sources. The results suggest that the errors in the information prescribed in the lateral boundary conditions are the most influential in the quality of the predictions. Errors in the wind field also have a smaller but non-negligible influence. Although the system is in the initial implementation phase and should be improved upon in the future, it is now a useful tool for harbour management. The predictions will be very helpful for harbour operations, pollution risk management and fighting oil spills.

Figures

  • Fig. 1. – Top: Barcelona, Tarragona and Bilbao harbour locations (PRT-BCN, PRT-TGN and PRT-BIL, respectively) on the Spanish coast and the domains of the intermediate models (i.e. SHE-CAT, SHE-BIL, CST-BCN, CST-TGN and CST-BIL). The star indicates the location of the measurement point used to validate the SHE-CAT shelf model. Bottom: harbour layouts. The circles and crosses in Barcelona and Bilbao harbours indicate the location of the ADCP and wind measurements, respectively. WS is the reference wind station for Barcelona harbour.
  • Fig. 2. – Time evolution for the RMSE (cm s–1) between the delayed and the reference (REF-BCN and REF-BIL) simulations for runs started on different dates. (a) Results for Barcelona harbour; dotted, black and grey lines correspond to runs started on 5, 8 and 11 October 2007, respectively. (b) Results for Bilbao harbour; dotted, black and grey lines correspond to runs started approx. on 1, 3 and 5 August 2008, respectively. The time evolution of the mean current (cm s–1) within the harbours (black thin lines) is also shown.
  • Fig. 3. – (a) Observed tracking of a surface drifting buoy near Bilbao harbour (dotted line) compared with the predicted trajectories by ESEOAT (black line) and SHE-BIL (grey line) models, between 3 and 6 June 2010. (b) Progressive vectors from the ADCP (grey line) located over the Mediterranean shelf and from ESEOMED (black line) and SHE-CAT (dotted line) models, between 1 and 31 October 2007.
  • Fig. 4. – Comparison between the measured and computed U and V current components at the sea surface (a, c) and 7 m depth (b, d), at the location of the ADCP in the Bilbao harbour, for the period between 23 July and 2 September 2008. The correlation coefficients (R) and the RMSE (cm s–1) for each component are also shown.
  • Fig. 5. – Variance ellipses of measured (in black) and modelled (in grey) currents for the autumn period of 2003 and 2009, respectively, in Barcelona harbour. Arrows show mean velocities. D1, D2 and D3 denote the location of the measurement points referred to in the text.
  • Fig. 6. – Sensitivity of circulation to wind errors in Barcelona (left panel) and Bilbao (right panel) harbours, for October 2007 and August 2008, respectively. (a, b) Wind stress components (Nm–2) used for the experiments: observed winds (blue line) and modelled winds obtained with HIRLAM (red line). (c, d) RMSE (cm s–1) obtained with HIRLAM winds. (e, f) NSR (%; see text for details). The results are masked outside the harbour because the colour scales are too different (larger outside).
  • Fig. 7. – Snapshot of the wind forcing used in the experiments BCN-1 (a) and BCN-1b (b), corresponding to 3 October 2007. Time series of current magnitude in the north (c) and south (d) mouths for both experiments. A colour version of this figure may be found in the online electronic manuscript.
  • Fig. 8. – Impact of lateral boundary conditions errors in Barcelona (left panel) and Bilbao (right panel) harbours, for October 2007 and August 2008, respectively. (a) Shelf current components (cm s–1) from observations (blue line) and provided by the coastal model (red line). (b) Sea level (m) from observations (blue line) and provided by the coastal model (red line). Also, the difference is plotted (green line). (c, d) RMSE (cm s–1) obtained with the coastal model results for the lateral boundary conditions. (e, f) NSR (%; see text for details). The results are masked outside the harbour because the colour scales are too different (larger outside).

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grifoll, M., Jordà, G., Sotillo, M. G., Ferrer, L., Espino, M., Sánchez-Arcilla, A., & Álvarez-Fanjul, E. (2012). Water circulation forecasting in Spanish harbours. Scientia Marina, 76(S1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.03606.18b

Readers over time

‘12‘14‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

64%

Researcher 4

36%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

33%

Engineering 3

33%

Environmental Science 2

22%

Physics and Astronomy 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0