Club formation by rational sharing: Content, viability and community structure

2Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A sharing community prospers when participation and contribution are both high. We suggest the two, while being related decisions every peer makes, should be given separate rational bases. Considered as such, a basic issue is the viability of club formation, which necessitates the modelling of two major sources of heterogeneity, namely, peers and shared content. This viability perspective clearly explains why rational peers contribute (or free-ride when they don't.) and how their collective action determines viability as well as the size of the club formed. It also exposes another fundamental source of limitation to club formation apart from free-riding, in the community structure in terms of the relation between peers' interest (demand) and sharing (supply). © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ng, W. Y., Chiu, D. M., & Lin, W. K. (2005). Club formation by rational sharing: Content, viability and community structure. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3828 LNCS, pp. 161–173). https://doi.org/10.1007/11600930_17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free