The appleton consensus: Suggested international guidelines for dicisions to forego medical treatment

59Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Thirty-three physicians, bioethicists, and medical economists from ten different countries met at Lawrence University, Appleton, Wiscounsin, to create The Appleton Consensus: International Guidelines for Decisions to Forego Medical Treatment. The guidelines deal with four specific decision-making circumstances: 1. Five guidelines for decisions involving competent patients or patients who have executed an advance directive before becoming incompetent, and those guidelines fell into three categories. 2. Thirteen guidelines were created for decisions involving patients who were once competent, but are not now competent, who have not executed an advance directive. 3. Seven guidelines were created for decisions involving patients who are not now and never been competent, for whom 'no substituted judgement' can be rendered. 4. Eleven guidelines were created for decisions involving the scarcity of medical resources, which exists in all communities. Five concepts were identified as being critical in the establishment of priorities, given the reality of scare health resources (1).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stanley, J. M. (1989). The appleton consensus: Suggested international guidelines for dicisions to forego medical treatment. Journal of Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.15.3.129

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free