Technical, physiological and anatomic considerations in nerve conduction studies

6Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Nerve conduction studies and their interpretation are subject to a variety of factors. First, technical factors including submaximal stimulation, environmental electrical noise, inaccurate placement of the recording electrodes, and stimulus artifact can substantially interfere with accurate recording of nerve and muscle responses. Second, physiological factors, such as the effects of body height and age, can cause profound variation in all nerve conduction parameters, and studies require interpretation keeping these individual variations in mind. Another physiological factor is temperature, in which cooling can produce a variety of changes, including slowing of conduction velocity and increase of response amplitude. Anatomic factors are also important, the most common being the Martin-Gruber anastomosis, usually presenting with a reduction in response amplitude with proximal stimulation of the ulnar nerve, and the second most common being the presence of an accessory peroneal nerve. Paying constant attention to all of these details is a critical element to the accurate performance and interpretation of nerve conduction studies. © 2007 Humana Press Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Caress, J. B. (2007). Technical, physiological and anatomic considerations in nerve conduction studies. In The Clinical Neurophysiology Primer (pp. 217–227). Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-271-7_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free