Anatomical and visual outcome of stages 4 and 5 retinopathy of prematurity

54Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To describe our experience in surgical management of stages 4 and 5 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and assess its anatomical and visual outcome. Materials and methods: This study is a retrospective, interventional, consecutive case series. It involved 33 eyes of 29 infants. The data were retrieved retrospectively for each case from their medical records. All the eyes underwent primary vitrectomy with additional procedures like scleral buckling (two eyes), lensectomy (14 eyes), subretinal fluid drainage (two eyes), and one case of corneal transplant (open sky vitrectomy). The anatomical and visual outcome was reviewed at the final follow-up. Results: The mean gestational age was 29.7 weeks (range 25-34 weeks) and mean birth weight was 1332 g (range 650-2050 g). Anatomical success for stage 4A was defined as complete retinal attachment with undistorted or minimally distorted posterior pole. For stage 4B, partial residual retinal detachment and for stage 5 at least posterior pole attachment. Visual acuity was measured in anatomically successful eyes that were cooperative. The anatomical outcome was 90% (9/10 eyes) for stage 4A, 44.4% (4/9 eyes) for stage 4B, and 14.3% (2/14) for stage 5. The mean follow-up was 19.1 months. Posterior retinotomy was the commonest complication for stage 4B (66.7%). Conclusion: Anatomical and visual success was the best for stage 4A ROP. Surgery for stage 4A can halt progression to stages 4B or 5 ROP. Aggressive peeling of posterior membranes should be avoided for stage 4B. Anatomical and visual outcome is very poor for stage 5. © 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shah, P. K., Narendran, V., Kalpana, N., & Tawansy, K. A. (2009). Anatomical and visual outcome of stages 4 and 5 retinopathy of prematurity. Eye, 23(1), 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702939

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free