Tight bounds for the distribution-free testing of monotone conjunctions

17Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We improve both upper and lower bounds for the distributionfree testing of monotone conjunctions. Given oracle access to an unknown Boolean function f: {0,1}n → {0,1} and sampling oracle access to an unknown distribution V over {0,1}", we present an Ō(n1/3/ϵ5)-query algorithm that tests whether f is a monotone conjunction versus E-far from any monotone conjunction with respect to D. This improves the previous best upper bound of Ō(n1/2/ϵ) by Dolev and Ron [DR11], when 1/ϵ is small compared to n. For some constant ϵo > 0, we also prove a lower bound of Ω(nM1/3) for the query complexity, improving the previous best lower bound of Ω(nM1/5) by Glasner and Servedio [GS09]. Our upper and lower bounds are tight, up to a polylogarithmic factor, when the distance parameter e is a constant. Furthermore, the same upper and lower bounds can be extended to the distribution-free testing of general conjunctions, and the lower bound can be extended to that of decision lists and linear threshold functions.

References Powered by Scopus

A theory of the learnable

3706Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Property Testing and Its Connection to Learning and Approximation

855Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Robust characterizations of polynomials with applications to program testing

690Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Almost optimal distribution-free junta testing

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Distribution-Free junta testing

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Distribution-free Junta Testing

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, X., & Xie, J. (2016). Tight bounds for the distribution-free testing of monotone conjunctions. In Proceedings of the Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (Vol. 1, pp. 54–71). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974331.ch5

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

54%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

23%

Researcher 2

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 12

86%

Physics and Astronomy 1

7%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0