Does Super-Resolution fluorescence microscopy obsolete previous microscopic approaches to protein Co-Localization?

32Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Conventional microscopy techniques, namely, the confocal microscope or deconvolution processes, are resolution limited to approximately 200–250 nm by the diffraction properties of light as developed by Ernst Abbe in 1873. This diffraction limit is appreciably above the size of most multi-protein complexes, which are typically 20–50 nm in diameter. In the mid-2000s, biophysicists moved beyond the diffraction barrier by structuring the illumination pattern and then applying mathematical principles and algorithms to allow a resolution of approximately 100 nm, sufficient to address protein subcellular co-localization questions. This “breaking” of the diffraction barrier, affording resolution beyond 200 nm, is termed super- resolution microscopy. More recent approaches include single-molecule localization (such as photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM)/stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM)) and point spread function engineering (such as stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy). In this review, we explain basic principles behind currently commercialized super-resolution setups and address advantages and considerations in applying these techniques to protein co-localization in biological systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

MacDonald, L., Baldini, G., & Storrie, B. (2015). Does Super-Resolution fluorescence microscopy obsolete previous microscopic approaches to protein Co-Localization? Methods in Molecular Biology, 1270, 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2309-0_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free