Background: To investigate the prevention of platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR) by platelet antigen gene matching using literature search and meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed (2000.1–2021.8), Embase (2000.1–2021.8), Cochrane (2010.1–2021.8), and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database CBM (2010.1–2021.8) were selected as the search database platform. The keywords (HLA/Human leukocyte antigen), (HPA/Human platelet alloantigens), (genotyping/cross-match), platelet transfusion (PLT), and (CCI/Corrected Count Increment) were used for the joint search. After the literature was screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria, the Cochrane intervention handbook was used for bias risk assessment, and Revman 5.3.5 software was used for analysis to obtain the statistical forest plot and funnel plot. Results: The preliminary results revealed 255 publications, and seven (297 patients in total) were finally included in the quantitative analysis. A total of five publications reported comparison of the 1 h CCI index of HLA or HPA gene matching and PLT after random selection, and the heterogeneity test showed statistical difference (I2=49%, P=0.10). The combined statistical analysis results were: (MD =8.57, 95% CI: 7.30–9.80, Z=13.30, P<0.00001), and while six publications reported the effective rate index of PLT, and the heterogeneity test showed no statistical difference (I2 =43%, P=0.12). The fixed effect mode was used to compare the effective rate of the two intervention methods (OR =4.90, 95% CI: 3.50–6.86, Z=9.23, P<0.00001). Discussion: HLA or HPA gene matching can improve the increment after PLT and reduce the incidence of ineffective PLT.
CITATION STYLE
Wang, J., Zhang, X., & Li, Y. (2021). Prevention of platelet transfusion refractoriness by platelet antigen gene matching: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Palliative Medicine, 10(10), 10946–10953. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-21-2603
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.