Skip to main content
Book Chapter

In Defence Of The Dog: Response To Restall

  • Read S
Springer Netherlands, (2009), 175-180
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2808-3_11
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Greg Restall challenges the relevantist to explain the Dog's reasoning in pursuing the Man down the right fork, having only verified that the Man did not take the left fork. I do so, showing thereby not only what the relevantist must mean by validity, but why Restall's pluralism is an incoherent and untenable position.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Read, S. (2009). In Defence Of The Dog: Response To Restall. In Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science (pp. 175–180). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2808-3_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free