Field validity, reproducibility and feasibility of diagnostic tests for visceral leishmaniasis in rural Nepal

47Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the field accuracy, reproducibility and feasibility of the formol gel test (FGT), the urine latex agglutination test (KAtex) and a rK39 antigen-based dipstick for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) in rural Nepal. METHOD: Patients with clinical suspicion of VL were recruited at Rangeli District Hospital (DH), a 15-bed government hospital located in south-eastern Nepal. FGT, KAtex and rK39 dipstick tests were performed on site and later repeated at a reference kala-azar diagnostic laboratory to assess reproducibility. Diagnosis of VL was confirmed by either a positive bone marrow aspirate examination or a positive direct agglutination test (DAT titre ≥1:3200) in patients who later responded to anti-leishmanial therapy. RESULTS: Of 155 patients initially recruited, 142 (85 with VL and 57 with another diagnosis) were included in the study. The sensitivity of the rK39 dipstick [89%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 81-94] was significantly higher than that of the KAtex (57%; 95% CI: 46-67) and the FGT (52%; 95% CI: 41-62). All three tests had a specificity of at least 90%. Agreement was higher for the rK39 dipstick (κ = 0.87) than for the FGT (0.68) and the KAtex (0.43). All tests required ≤20 min of actual work and ≤40 min to obtain the results. CONCLUSION: The rK39 dipstick was easy to do, more accurate and reproducible than other rapid diagnostic tests for VL in a DH of rural Nepal. It should be integrated into the field diagnostic algorithm of VL in this region and mechanisms to secure its availability should be found. © 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chappuis, F., Rijal, S., Jha, U. K., Desjeux, P., Karki, B. M. S., Koirala, S., … Boelaert, M. (2006). Field validity, reproducibility and feasibility of diagnostic tests for visceral leishmaniasis in rural Nepal. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 11(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01533.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free